🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."